Lenovo 20202

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20202  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '23 at 14:20
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3632QM
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
64% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 77.4
2-Core 143
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 386
39% 319 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 645M
Legend(17AA 3904) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
5.29% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 7.6
5% 7.4 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 8
Splatting 6.9
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.29%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 64 65 66 67 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 352
Write 311
Mixed 317
SusWrite 85.4
60% 266 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 22.5
89% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 182
166% 250 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 85%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
62GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 86 86 86 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 81.4
Write 56.6
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 86
50% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3160ED58E9W1600 RMT3150ED58E8W1600 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.8
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20202 Builds (Compare 515 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20202

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback