Casper EXCALIBUR D300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCasper EXCALIBUR D300  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI Z270M MORTAR (MS-7A69)
Memory34.6 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '23 at 10:20
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 43%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 91
1-Core 127
2-Core 229
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 617
64% 514 Pts
64-Core 633
39% 633 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.9% Poor
Lighting 36.7
Reflection 45.9
Parallax 37.6
30% 40.1 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 26.7
27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA13.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 186 187 7.1 145 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 453
Write 298
Mixed 336
SusWrite 142
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 31.6
114% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 50.6
DQ Mixed 5.4
47% 116 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 102%
Samsung MZNLN128HAHQ-00000 128GB
118GB free
Firmware: MVT2200Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 162 162 162 163 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 470
Mixed 403
SusWrite 175
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 49.3
162% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 353
261% 345 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 96%
Great: 109%
Adata SU630 480GB
289GB free
Firmware: V8X01c86
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 46 54 73 77 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 361
Write 209
Mixed 109
SusWrite 78.2
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 27.5
86% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 85.3
84% 132 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 99%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
63GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 67 66 63 64 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 57.9
Write 56.9
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 64.9
37% 50.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS16G4D26BFSE.16FD 859B CT8G4DFS8266.C8FD1 859B BLS16G4D26BFSE.16FD 40GB
2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.2% Excellent
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 26.3
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 37.6
SC Mixed 25.9
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EXCALIBUR D300 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Casper EXCALIBUR D300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $308
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback