Acer ConceptD CN315-71

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer ConceptD CN315-71  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL PidgeyC_CFS
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201117
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateMay 21 '23 at 05:48
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 223
72% 131 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 529
54% 437 Pts
64-Core 635
39% 635 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1387) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3179
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
44.7% Average
Lighting 58.1
Reflection 63.6
Parallax 52.1
47% 57.9 fps
MRender 42.4
Gravity 51.6
Splatting 49.9
40% 48 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme 512GB 512GB
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 038B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1377 1405 1435 1484 1482 806 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 2,028
Write 1,537
Mixed 1,260
SusWrite 1,331
344% 1,539 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 44.7
154% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 459
DQ Write 501
DQ Mixed 554
396% 505 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 232%
Great: 260%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P32MCST2-BW4S 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.1% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 12
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ConceptD CN315-71 Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer ConceptD CN315-71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback