Asrock B560M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock B560M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210415
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateMay 20 '23 at 15:19
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User OMN-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 116
2-Core 213
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 518
56% 444 Pts
64-Core 583
36% 583 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$334
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.4.1
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 111
Reflection 135
Parallax 226
91% 157 fps
MRender 217
Gravity 118
Splatting 184
142% 173 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N400 SSD 240GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM6C.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 108 92 103 81 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 410
Write 229
Mixed 297
SusWrite 92.7
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 23.2
88% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 69.3
DQ Mixed 10.3
47% 112 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
61GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 156 150 157 155 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 188
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 156
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Essencore Limited KD48GU880-32A160U 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.9% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 10.9
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 10.9
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B560M-HDV Builds (Compare 1,470 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock B560M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $345
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback