Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175 23,835 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Memory 75 1-Core 44 2-Core 84.6 45% 67.9 Pts	4-Core 164 8-Core 194 23% 179 Pts	64-Core 220 14% 220 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180 23,273 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 3527) 1GB CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Lighting 15.8 Reflection 22.4 Parallax 17 13% 18.4 fps	MRender 24.3 Gravity 18 Splatting 16.2 16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
JAJS300M240C 240GB 1,437 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2200SC6A SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 384 377 399 407 404 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Read 468 Write 363 Mixed 371 SusWrite 392 90% 398 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 60.5 4K Mixed 28.5 106% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 65.5 DQ Mixed 78.3 61% 84.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL9-9-9 DDR3- 2x4GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 12.7 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 8.4 19% 6.8 GB/s	Latency 90.4 44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	149x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	68x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 39%, 4,786 samples	62x

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $366

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16