HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '23 at 08:56
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3220-$36
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
40.8% Average
Memory 59.3
1-Core 60.6
2-Core 127
48% 82.3 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 134
18% 132 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 18E7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.66% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 3
2% 2.2 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.66%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$49
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 40 41 42 43 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 59.1
Write 56.5
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 40.9
35% 48.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 42%
WDC WD50 00AAKX-00ERMA0 500GB
35GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 69 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 70.4
Write 71
Mixed 49.9
SusWrite 69.4
88% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M379B5773CH0-CH9 1201 R332G1339U1S-UO 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.3% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 10.3
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 7.2
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback