TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-1551

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star Modern 15 A10RBS
MotherboardMSI MS-1551  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201217
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateMay 20 '23 at 08:44
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10710U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 75
1-Core 118
2-Core 217
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 588
65% 511 Pts
64-Core 711
44% 711 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 77.3%
 Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX350
MSI(1462 12AD) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3179
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Lighting 28.6
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 26.6
23% 26.7 fps
MRender 17.8
Gravity 27.5
Splatting 17.2
17% 20.8 fps
Poor: 12% ↑
This bench: 21.1%
 Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
316GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1000 1045 1049 1071 669 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 1,568
Write 1,073
Mixed 974
SusWrite 824
248% 1,110 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 70.2
236% 80 MB/s
DQ Read 608
DQ Write 592
DQ Mixed 262
290% 488 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑
This bench: 213%
 Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.4% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 10.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 8.5
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 36.4%
 Great: 46%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-1551 Builds (Compare 470 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1551

CPU
Core i5-10210UIntelBench 53%, 54,859 samples252x
Core i7-10510UIntelBench 56%, 51,080 samples127x
Core i7-10710UIntelBench 68%, 6,640 samples47x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 110,580 samples370x
GeForce MX330NvidiaBench 14%, 4,518 samples38x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 6,852 samples37x
SSD
OM8PCP3512F-AI1 512GBKingstonBench 135%, 20,980 samples109x
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples86x
TOSHIBA 512GBKbg30zmv512gBench 122%, 10,256 samples60x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples94x
HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 1x8GBHynixBench 46%, 20,752 samples44x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples40x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback