Lenovo 20J4S01900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20J4S01900  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20J4S01900
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170831
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 20 '23 at 05:50
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 71
2-Core 173
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 255
34% 254 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 5060) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9559
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.68% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 3
Parallax 7.1
5% 5.5 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.68%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-SB128 128GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GS72201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 143 125 137 131 138 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 328
Write 174
Mixed 213
SusWrite 138
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 20.8
67% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 170
145% 216 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 82%
Hitachi HTS725050A9A364 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: PC4ZC70F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 99 99 98 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
57% Above average
Read 100
Write 94.7
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 98.5
63% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 57%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.4% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 20.4
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 19.7
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20J4S01900 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20J4S01900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback