Dell Studio XPS 9100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Studio XPS 9100  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 05DN3X
Memory6.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20101021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '23 at 20:03
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 44%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 930-$199
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 95.4
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 125
63% 97.9 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 330
34% 277 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (66 fps cap detected)
52.3% Above average
Lighting 64.3
Reflection 66
Parallax 61.4
52% 63.9 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 66.1
Splatting 60.1
52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$275
568GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 191 198 215 220 216 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 410
Write 146
Mixed 258
SusWrite 204
56% 255 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 26.1
4K Mixed 19.3
66% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 67.5
DQ Mixed 124
100% 147 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 133%
Toshiba HDWR11A 10TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 167 171 172 178 179 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 158
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 172
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 135%
Toshiba HDWF180 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: GX0B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 135 137 143 146 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 153
Write 126
Mixed 75.4
SusWrite 140
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.7
306% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 133%
Hitachi HUS 724040ALE640 4TB
808GB free
Firmware: MJAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 144 145 145 146 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 125
Write 126
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 145
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
169% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 91%
Toshiba HDWF180 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: GX0B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 198 203 207 213 213 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 224
Write 232
Mixed 102
SusWrite 206
139% 191 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.8
304% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB
4.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 140 141 144 147 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
67% Good
Read 160
Write 121
Mixed 103
SusWrite 143
174% 132 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 3.1
253% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KP223C-ELD 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 19.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 13.3
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 56
71% 56 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 9100 Builds (Compare 422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Dell Studio XPS 9100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $419
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback