Positivo POS-EINM70CS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemPositivo POS-EINM70CS  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-EINM70CS
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130415
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMay 19 '23 at 13:29
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 847-$259
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Memory 61.4
1-Core 27.3
2-Core 44.8
32% 44.5 Pts
4-Core 43.4
8-Core 46.1
6% 44.8 Pts
64-Core 43.1
3% 43.1 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 2111) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.67 fps
MRender 1.2
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1
1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.55%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2227P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 101 107 154 157 152 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.7% Below average
Read 208
Write 184
Mixed 130
SusWrite 136
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 6.5
36% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 88.6
DQ Write 70.1
DQ Mixed 14.9
29% 57.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.63 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POS-EINM70CS Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-EINM70CS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback