Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive30.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 06 '17 at 18:20
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 82.9
1-Core 48.2
2-Core 90.2
49% 73.8 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 247
26% 206 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460 SE
Gigabyte(1458 350D) 1GB
CLim: 730 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.43
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 13
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 11.4
11% 13.2 fps
MRender 18.7
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 16.6
13% 16.2 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC311 SATA 256GB
170GB free
Firmware: 70000P10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 486
Write 418
Mixed 468
102% 457 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 30.5
92% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 72.5
57% 74.6 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 97%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 157
Write 81.1
Mixed 99.4
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 8.1
55% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 55.7
DQ Mixed 7.58
25% 56.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60
1TB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 176
Mixed 172
135% 179 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.31
89% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 105%
Great: 113%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
785GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 139
Write 101
Mixed 125
92% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 2.16
4K Mixed 0.17
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
481GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 79.4
Write 80.2
Mixed 77.3
60% 79 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 2.22
4K Mixed 0.27
106% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 83%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
299GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 162
Mixed 146
121% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.06
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.17
97% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 107%
ST310005 24AS 1TB
337GB free, PID 2336
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 34.1
Write 35.5
Mixed 32.8
44% 34.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.32
65% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.6% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 12.9
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 9.6
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,832 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $354
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback