MSI H110M PRO-VH (MS-7996)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7996
MotherboardMSI H110M PRO-VH (MS-7996)  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171204
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 18 '23 at 22:07
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 44%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$134
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 378
51% 382 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 146
Parallax 136
110% 139 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 140
Splatting 122
103% 127 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0330A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 86 44 30 30 29 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45% Average
Read 259
Write 61.7
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 65
22% 103 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 20.9
4K Mixed 20
71% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 2.2
57% 133 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45%
Great: 93%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 105 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 110
Write 105
Mixed 71.4
SusWrite 105
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 67%
Seagate ST500DM005 HD502HJ 500GB
399GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 136 138 138 137 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 116
Write 82.5
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 136
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
56.8% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 18.3
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 17.2
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 76.1
52% 76.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M PRO-VH (MS-7996) Builds (Compare 1,269 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M PRO-VH (MS-7996) - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback