Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive85.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20131215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '23 at 15:33
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 132
57% 93.2 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 184
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
AMD(1002 990C) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 22.10.01.03
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
5.4% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 7.3
6% 7.13 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 7.2
5% 6.1 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.4%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
372GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 308 328 349 381 382 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 382
Write 338
Mixed 316
SusWrite 340
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 66.7
4K Mixed 36.5
124% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 224
172% 234 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0N RMR5030KD68F9 NT2GC64B88B0N RMR5030KD68F9 12GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.3% Poor
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 9.7
28% 9.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.9
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A75M-D3H Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback