Lenovo 30FA002JUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 30FA002JUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 330E
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230423
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 18 '23 at 13:58
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i9-12900T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
30.1% Below average
Memory 43.2
1-Core 186
2-Core 65.1
64% 98.2 Pts
4-Core 93.1
8-Core 167
16% 130 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia T400 4GB
Legend(17AA 1613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 22.9
Parallax 18.6
16% 20.5 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 21.7
18% 21.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00BL7 512GB
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 727 983 1316 1403 1640 1237 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,230
Write 994
Mixed 1,542
SusWrite 1,218
281% 1,246 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 70.2
231% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 203
152% 200 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 205%
Great: 419%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 20.7
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 14.7
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30FA002JUS Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Lenovo 30FA002JUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback