HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 836B
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '23 at 07:27
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 86%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Memory 22.2
1-Core 14.4
2-Core 22.4
13% 19.7 Pts
4-Core 38
8-Core 51.2
6% 44.6 Pts
64-Core 48.9
3% 48.9 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
HP(103C 836B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6194
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.94% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 2.2
2% 4.13 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.3
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.94%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$50
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 504 287 185 171 239 281 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
62% Good
Read 765
Write 522
Mixed 442
SusWrite 278
112% 502 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 11.4
4K Mixed 11.1
36% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 90.8
DQ Write 53.7
DQ Mixed 64.8
50% 69.8 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 62%
Great: 193%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
919GB free
Firmware: RXM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 161 161 155 167 168 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 134
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 162
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
208% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 91%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8MH-8 HP26D4S9S8ME-8 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
25.7% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 11.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.3
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 305
13% 305 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx Builds (Compare 2,476 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback