bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DX58SO
Memory9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20100414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '23 at 05:50
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
J1PR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 152
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 333
36% 288 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1075 MHz, MLim: 1900 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.6% Average
Lighting 52
Reflection 55.1
Parallax 69.3
42% 58.8 fps
MRender 56.6
Gravity 56.5
Splatting 38
40% 50.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 541ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 68 69 64 64 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
37% Below average
Read 220
Write 70.9
Mixed 108
SusWrite 66.5
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 20.4
71% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 26.4
DQ Write 63.9
DQ Mixed 30.5
28% 40.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37%
Great: 69%
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 128GB
39GB free
Firmware: HTRAN101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 132 131 122 119 115 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.2% Average
Read 228
Write 137
Mixed 170
SusWrite 126
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 22.2
68% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 28.1
DQ Write 58.1
DQ Mixed 27.8
26% 38 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
40.2% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 14
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,451 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback