Ergodevices 7500-0160A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemErgodevices 7500-0160A  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte H81M-DS2V
Memory6.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140819
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 17 '23 at 23:12
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 64%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 100
2-Core 185
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 334
40% 309 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 224
Parallax 136
110% 165 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 140
Splatting 122
104% 128 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 128GB SSD 128GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN09593
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 458
Write 430
Mixed 377
94% 422 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 30.3
134% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 237
184% 250 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 99%
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89
72GB free
Firmware: X232201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 148 204 272 280 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28% Poor
Read 116
Write 108
Mixed 60
SusWrite 179
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 26.8
4K Mixed 6.1
28% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 76.9
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 57.4
52% 78.8 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 28%
Great: 89%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
425GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 118 118 118 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 115
Write 114
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 118
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
50.9% Above average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 15.5
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7500-0160A Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

System: Ergodevices 7500-0160A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $335
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback