HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics39.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87D6
Memory6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210329
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 17 '23 at 21:03
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 62%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 61.9
1-Core 129
2-Core 231
76% 140 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 586
61% 490 Pts
64-Core 705
44% 705 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
HP(103C 8558) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.3% Below average
Lighting 50.7
Reflection 71.8
Parallax 43.7
41% 55.4 fps
MRender 39.1
Gravity 47.3
Splatting 43.1
35% 43.2 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
604GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1014 1060 1066 951 916 854 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 922
Write 962
Mixed 943
SusWrite 977
215% 951 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 36.5
126% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 934
DQ Write 692
DQ Mixed 856
628% 828 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 171%
Great: 394%
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199
85GB free
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 119 133 130 133 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 128
Write 182
Mixed 156
SusWrite 129
34% 149 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 20.8
70% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 152
123% 174 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 66%
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
299GB free
Firmware: 8101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 291 288 267 266 263 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 288
Write 236
Mixed 228
SusWrite 276
58% 257 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 20.6
66% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 185
146% 203 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 119%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
177GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 118 118 119 118 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 152
Write 140
Mixed 38
SusWrite 117
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
134% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G44AB0-CWE CT8G4DFRA266.C8FE 16GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
49.1% Average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 17.2
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 14.9
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx Builds (Compare 5,518 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $398
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback