Positivo Master D6200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPositivo Master D6200  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-RIB360EE
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '23 at 20:46
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100-$122
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 121
2-Core 242
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 405
51% 387 Pts
64-Core 405
25% 405 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
ASRock(1849 3E91) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
4.23% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 7
5% 6.2 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.23%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AS-256 256GB
223GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1A30C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 3.8 59 221 224 227 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 461
Write 246
Mixed 280
SusWrite 149
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 10.7
88% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 14.2
64% 142 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
37.4% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 11.2
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Master D6200 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo Master D6200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $122
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback