Pcware IPMH410G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics73.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPcware IPMH410G  (all builds)
MotherboardPCWARE IPMH410G
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200709
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateMay 17 '23 at 17:43
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 90.8
1-Core 128
2-Core 247
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 751
75% 613 Pts
64-Core 989
61% 989 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Asus(1043 872A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Lighting 93.2
Reflection 90.1
Parallax 92.6
76% 92 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 79.1
Splatting 71
70% 87.9 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 250GB-$46
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0704A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 139 50 42 40 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 412
Write 358
Mixed 358
SusWrite 102
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 24.5
98% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 49
80% 152 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 98%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$26
701GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 126 137 138 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 122
Write 136
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 134
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HTH5AN8G6NCJR-VKD 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.1% Above average
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.3
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 23.5
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IPMH410G Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Pcware IPMH410G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $174
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback