Asus PRO H410M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive99.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRO H410M-C  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '23 at 17:29
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 72.5
1-Core 127
2-Core 252
81% 150 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 610
65% 517 Pts
64-Core 637
39% 637 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250
Sapphire(174B E269) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
7.73% Terrible
Lighting 9.8
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 14.1
8% 11.5 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 8.2
7% 8.87 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.73%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S650 120GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11611
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 427 393 111 115 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 463
Mixed 439
SusWrite 265
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 47.6
177% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 192
153% 207 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 98%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
847GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 168 171 172 172 168 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 37.6
Write 49.2
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 170
52% 71 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
60% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
81.6% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 24.6
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 26.6
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 95.7
42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRO H410M-C Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRO H410M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $266
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback