Asrock X370M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 244%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 239%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics253% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive286% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock X370M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '23 at 16:25
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$166
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 76.2
1-Core 167
2-Core 332
101% 192 Pts
4-Core 665
8-Core 1,093
107% 879 Pts
64-Core 1,393
86% 1,393 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 100%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$765
PNY(196E 13B5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
253% Outstanding
Lighting 372
Reflection 359
Parallax 415
303% 382 fps
MRender 506
Gravity 307
Splatting 221
267% 345 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 253%
Great: 256%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
880GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC2S038D Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1656 1441 1255 1730 1579 1695 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
286% Outstanding
Read 2,052
Write 1,736
Mixed 1,272
SusWrite 1,560
371% 1,655 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 62.7
224% 82.5 MB/s
DQ Read 685
DQ Write 1,076
DQ Mixed 860
657% 874 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 286%
Great: 320%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.5% Good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 26.9
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 27.2
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X370M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback