Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 6,890 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Memory 80.6 1-Core 66.6 2-Core 157 60% 101 Pts	4-Core 268 8-Core 438 43% 353 Pts	64-Core 543 34% 543 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 75%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Fanxiang S660 500GB 142 User benchmarks, average bench 315% 287GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.W.8.R2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1971 2059 1030 636 516 492 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	206% Outstanding	Read 2,028 Write 2,059 Mixed 1,757 SusWrite 1,117 391% 1,740 MB/s	4K Read 43.7 4K Write 70.2 4K Mixed 40.8 156% 51.6 MB/s	DQ Read 59 DQ Write 348 DQ Mixed 160 136% 189 MB/s
Poor: 176% ↑ This bench: 206% Great: 406%
SSD 512GB 512GB 6,819 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 394GB free Firmware: 2A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 91 55 58 57 56 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Read 452 Write 386 Mixed 357 SusWrite 120 73% 329 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 51 4K Mixed 20.4 85% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 251 DQ Write 293 DQ Mixed 1.5 76% 182 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 211%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 8G 3200 2x8GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.1% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 16.6 53% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 14 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 79.5 50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	488x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	481x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	460x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,369x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	490x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	355x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16