Acer Spin SP513-51

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 12 months ago.
SystemAcer Spin SP513-51  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Drift_SK
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171214
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 17 '23 at 04:32
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4415U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 6
2-Core 12.4
4% 9.2 Pts
4-Core 16.6
8-Core 25.5
3% 21 Pts
64-Core 23.2
1% 23.2 Pts
Poor: 29% Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 610
Acer(1025 1139) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4771
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
0.87% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.87%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 120 124 121 123 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.4% Poor
Read 158
Write 127
Mixed 137
SusWrite 121
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 7.9
27% 8.33 MB/s
DQ Read 60.4
DQ Write 41.5
DQ Mixed 47.4
36% 49.8 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1P24HC4R1-BUNS 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
10% Very poor
MC Read 2.1
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 4.6
11% 3.93 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 0.5
4% 1.53 GB/s
Latency 656
6% 656 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 10%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Spin SP513-51 Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Spin SP513-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback