TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Nitro AN515-55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-55  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Stonic_CMS
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210820
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateMay 16 '23 at 20:38
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Memory 17.4
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 178
48% 98 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 541
49% 410 Pts
64-Core 547
34% 547 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 34.9%
 Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 143D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.74% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 43.8
Parallax 5.9
4% 18.4 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 8.8
5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 4.74%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDB 512GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 583
Write 1,015
Mixed 667
170% 755 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 32.6
106% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 433
DQ Write 382
DQ Mixed 413
308% 409 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 198%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$105
47GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 306 292 266 185 178 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
66% Good
Read 321
Write 78.8
Mixed 275
SusWrite 251
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 23.9
77% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 304
229% 306 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 66%
 Great: 128%
Nvme Apacer AS2280Q4 1TB
801GB free
Firmware: 2PJ0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1269 1452 1354 1122 585 540 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
115% Outstanding
Read 388
Write 566
Mixed 418
SusWrite 1,054
138% 606 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 16.5
54% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 398
DQ Write 415
DQ Mixed 446
324% 420 MB/s
Poor: 150% ↑
This bench: 115%
 Great: 360%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA2GS6AJR8N-XN 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 5.1
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 5.9
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 340
12% 340 ns
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 18.6%
 Great: 53%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Nitro AN515-55 Builds (Compare 15,983 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-55

CPU
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples12,314x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples3,624x
Core i7-10870HIntelBench 79%, 23,498 samples42x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples8,432x
GeForce GTX 1650NvidiaBench 40%, 34,471 samples1,610x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples1,539x
SSD
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 169%, 12,303 samples2,470x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1114 512GBWDCBench 167%, 6,790 samples2,166x
WDC PC SN530 SDB 512GBNvmeBench 156%, 3,698 samples1,651x
RAM
HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 1x8GBHynixBench 46%, 20,752 samples2,338x
HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 2x8GBHynixBench 88%, 37,566 samples1,707x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples1,628x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback