Toshiba Satellite C55-B

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

11 months ago, 11 months ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite C55-B (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA ZCWAA
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141120
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 16 '23 at 17:28
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	PER-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-5200U 107,407 User benchmarks, average bench 42% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Memory 65.8 1-Core 64.6 2-Core 106 49% 78.9 Pts	4-Core 146 8-Core 152 20% 149 Pts	64-Core 151 9% 151 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 F910) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	3.87% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 5.3 4% 4.07 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 4.1 Splatting 6.5 4% 5.23 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.87% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 138GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKJ4.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 364 364 357 371 367 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 371 Write 399 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 339 63% 283 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 14.7 4K Mixed 7.9 56% 15.9 MB/s	DQ Read 44 DQ Write 15 DQ Mixed 18.6 17% 25.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 100%
Sage 3639S 1TB 191 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 161GB free Firmware: 0056 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 37 39 40 38 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	20.6% Poor	Read 33.4 Write 35.2 Mixed 33.1 SusWrite 38 26% 34.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.1% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 13.9 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 12.5 33% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C55-B Builds (Compare 385 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55-B

CPU
Core i3-4005UIntelBench 39%, 37,483 samples	97x
Celeron N2840IntelBench 28%, 20,923 samples	96x
Celeron N2830IntelBench 29%, 10,608 samples	53x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	198x
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	154x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	20x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	7x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	99x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	47x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16