Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

12 months ago, 12 months ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705QA_X705QA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X705QA
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191031
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 16 '23 at 04:20
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	52%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-9620P APU (2016 M.BR) 6,180 User benchmarks, average bench 35% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	29.5% Poor	Memory 41.7 1-Core 54.3 2-Core 96.2 37% 64.1 Pts	4-Core 95.5 8-Core 129 14% 112 Pts	64-Core 148 9% 148 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 13,858 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1911) 512MB CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1215 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.44.13 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	1.57% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 6.3 Parallax 7.7 0% 4.7 fps	MRender 3.8 Gravity 6.5 Splatting 5.8 4% 5.37 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.57% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G1102 128GB 2,914 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6106002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 107 107 105 106 107 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.7% Below average	Read 242 Write 178 Mixed 196 SusWrite 108 40% 181 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 15 4K Mixed 11.7 39% 12.5 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 97 DQ Mixed 126 92% 120 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 93%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 931GB free Firmware: JU0C1J SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 126 115 119 128 126 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Read 115 Write 130 Mixed 50.4 SusWrite 122 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 0.6 222% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GB 48,644 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.8% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 5.1 15% 5.17 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 3.8 10% 3.4 GB/s	Latency 195 21% 195 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 35%, 17,422 samples	6x
A10-9620P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 35%, 6,180 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	6x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 13,858 samples	3x

SSD
SD9SN8W128G1102 128GBSandiskBench 67%, 2,914 samples	3x
RBUSNS8180DS3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 58%, 2,813 samples	2x
840 250GBSamsung $251Bench 70%, 41,998 samples	2x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	2x
HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 1x4GBHynixBench 31%, 5,641 samples	2x
RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 1x8GBRamaxelBench 39%, 16,227 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16