Http://www.abit.com.tw/ IP35 PRO(P35+ICH9R)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics64.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardHttp://www.abit.com.tw/ IP35 PRO(P35+ICH9R)  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090908
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 16 '23 at 00:57
Run Duration508 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
42.6% Average
Memory 66.8
1-Core 30.8
2-Core 62.2
36% 53.3 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 111
15% 110 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
64.5% Good
Lighting 81.4
Reflection 88.3
Parallax 78.5
66% 82.7 fps
MRender 78.2
Gravity 77.9
Splatting 69.2
61% 75.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MD10000-AQDW-RO 1TB
450GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 36 35 48 53 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 66.7
Write 68.4
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 43.4
42% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 50%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
116GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 127
91% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Mixed 0
19% 0.15 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 4.3
14% 4.93 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IP35 PRO(P35+ICH9R) Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Http://www.abit.com.tw/ IP35 PRO(P35+ICH9R)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $600
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $547Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback