Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemCyberpowerpc C SERIES  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B360M Xtreme
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateMay 15 '23 at 22:48
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 132
2-Core 267
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 669
77% 599 Pts
64-Core 731
45% 731 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1410 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Lighting 68.7
Reflection 63
Parallax 92.9
56% 74.9 fps
MRender 61.7
Gravity 78.8
Splatting 47.7
50% 62.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,393
Write 2,282
Mixed 2,013
497% 2,229 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 65.4
234% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,613
DQ Write 1,350
DQ Mixed 1,351
1,048% 1,438 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 507%
SSD 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 90 78 77 79 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 484
Write 392
Mixed 367
SusWrite 138
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 33
133% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 186
166% 249 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 108%
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$30
127GB free
Firmware: 0002CE02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 68 67 69 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 67.5
Write 65
Mixed 38.9
SusWrite 67.7
44% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D30AESCK.M8FE 859B BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
78.5% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 22.9
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 22.6
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $356
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback