TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

PC NH5xAx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemPC NH5xAx  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO NH50AF1
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200420
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 15 '23 at 20:11
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900 12-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 78.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 260
84% 155 Pts
4-Core 513
8-Core 1,014
90% 764 Pts
64-Core 2,020
125% 2,020 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 87.1%
 Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 50F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 119
Parallax 126
98% 122 fps
MRender 162
Gravity 119
Splatting 108
104% 130 fps
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 100%
 Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
760GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1051 1193 1299 1348 1227 850 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,416
Write 1,332
Mixed 276
SusWrite 1,161
234% 1,046 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 67.7
195% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 628
DQ Write 759
DQ Mixed 271
322% 553 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑
This bench: 221%
 Great: 255%
Sabrent Rocket Q 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: RKT30Q.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 984 1163 1231 1286 1271 1275 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
195% Outstanding
Read 337
Write 1,106
Mixed 670
SusWrite 1,201
190% 829 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 40.2
207% 79.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,236
DQ Write 872
DQ Mixed 1,015
769% 1,041 MB/s
Poor: 147% ↑
This bench: 195%
 Great: 368%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 238GB
222GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 429 433 434 433 430 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 470
Write 427
Mixed 290
SusWrite 429
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 22.3
76% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 35.3
74% 149 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 77.8%
 Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 35
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 33.1
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 104%
 Great: 100%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical NH5xAx Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

System: PC NH5xAx

CPU
Ryzen 9 3900 12-CoreAMDBench 88%, 4,397 samples12x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples6x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $81Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples4x
GPU
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples14x
RTX 2070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 88%, 23,316 samples9x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples1x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung  $159Bench 336%, 200,600 samples5x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples3x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples3x
RAM
CM4X16GE2666C18S4 2x16GBCorsairBench 83%, 1,876 samples9x
CM4X8GF2400C16S4 2x8GBCorsairBench 72%, 789 samples3x
CM4X32GE2666C18S2 1x31GBCorsairBench 45%, 173 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 146% - Outstanding Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback