Today's hottest deals

Dynabook SATELLITE PRO E10-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDynabook SATELLITE PRO E10-S  (all builds)
MotherboardDynabook DBIEMD00
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '23 at 12:37
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Memory 19.8
1-Core 21.8
2-Core 39
16% 26.9 Pts
4-Core 42.8
8-Core 110
9% 76.3 Pts
64-Core 89.2
6% 89.2 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(3100 0002) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.43% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 1.4
0% 0.73 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 0.1
1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.43%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 128GB SSD 128GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.1.3D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 201 251 304 114 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 282
Write 327
Mixed 243
SusWrite 210
60% 265 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 25.5
4K Mixed 16.3
48% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 154
110% 140 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 7.3
22% 7.53 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2
6% 2 GB/s
Latency 322
12% 322 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE PRO E10-S Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dynabook SATELLITE PRO E10-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback