User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8 GAMING
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211213
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 14 '23 at 19:24
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-4620 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 66.3
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 127
51% 86.3 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 497
44% 373 Pts
64-Core 801
50% 801 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac NVME SSD 256GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0225A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 795 133 123 235 139 238 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1867
Write 1,145
Mixed 1,033
SusWrite 277
239% 1,081 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 21.9
102% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 396
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 360
265% 350 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 137%
Great: 241%
Kingston SA400S3 960GB
355GB free
Firmware: 61F1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 410 410 351 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 434
Write 283
Mixed 314
SusWrite 298
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 27.3
96% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 209
178% 259 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown VMA45UG-MEC1U2AW2 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.4% Good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 23.9
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 12.5
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback