Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '23 at 16:46
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$355
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 82
1-Core 138
2-Core 276
90% 165 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 1,094
97% 822 Pts
64-Core 2,197
136% 2,197 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 147
Parallax 226
111% 170 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 156
Splatting 98.3
100% 125 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 106%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 2000GB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: UP4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 52 66 174 96 157 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 455
Write 389
Mixed 306
SusWrite 135
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 16
76% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 61.1
DQ Write 91.5
DQ Mixed 32.6
37% 61.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 56%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
371GB free
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 336 170 262 169 256 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 399
Mixed 227
SusWrite 263
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 45.6
158% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 204
158% 216 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
12GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 190 186 134 109 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 138
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 159
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 113%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
193GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 134 134 133 133 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 117
Write 123
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 133
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 77%
SAMSUNG HD502HJ 500GB
36GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 138 138 138 138 138 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59% Above average
Read 133
Write 143
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 137
164% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
145% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 59%
Great: 60%
SAMSUNG HD642JJ 640GB
86GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 57 56 56 56 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 105
Write 114
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 56.6
111% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 40%
SAMSUNG HD502IJ 500GB
116GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 56 56 56 56 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 50.8
Write 57.9
Mixed 40
SusWrite 56.4
70% 51.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 44.6
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 40.5
119% 41.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.4
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 38.4
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 111%
Great: 155%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 GAMING X Builds (Compare 3,963 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $820
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback