Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics88.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMay 14 '23 at 12:35
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 82
1-Core 63.6
2-Core 118
55% 87.7 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 367
36% 295 Pts
64-Core 364
22% 364 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.5% Excellent
Lighting 87.8
Reflection 134
Parallax 168
72% 130 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 90.9
Splatting 159
121% 148 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Emtec X150 480GB
357GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMBB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 321 308 346 223 283 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 375
Write 97.6
Mixed 248
SusWrite 287
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 29.9
104% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 31.9
DQ Write 73.1
DQ Mixed 39.6
34% 48.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 99%
AMD 3+1 Disk RAID5 1.5TB
884GB free
Firmware: 1.10
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 11718
Mixed 22.7
4,194% 5,870 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.3
108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 188%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-079.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.1% Average
MC Read 20
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 17.5
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 13.8
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback