Asus G551JM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics2.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemAsus G551JM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G551JM
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141013
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 14 '23 at 09:48
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 74.7
2-Core 135
48% 105 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 326
33% 267 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 31% Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 185D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.64% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 6.3
3% 8.47 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.9
3% 3.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.64%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS721060G9SA00 60GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MC3OC11H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 31 26 27 30 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 52.4
Write 38.4
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 26.4
26% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
20.4% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 7.5
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 1.7
7% 2.3 GB/s
Latency 706
6% 706 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G551JM Builds (Compare 386 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G551JM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback