Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	4.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

12 months ago, 12 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6600U 31,982 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Memory 11.2 1-Core 78.6 2-Core 136 37% 75.1 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 158 22% 162 Pts	64-Core 180 11% 180 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 5053) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	4.89% Terrible	Lighting 5.4 Reflection 4.8 Parallax 5.8 4% 5.33 fps	MRender 7 Gravity 5.3 Splatting 8.5 6% 6.93 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.89% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 320 316 337 353 349 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 270 Write 254 Mixed 297 SusWrite 330 65% 288 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 30.3 4K Mixed 18.7 58% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 232 DQ Write 206 DQ Mixed 188 150% 209 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 123%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6P1 Ramaxel RMT3160MP68FAF1600 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.4% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 12.2 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 5.5 18% 6.23 GB/s	Latency 393 10% 393 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-6600UIntelBench 45%, 31,982 samples	10x

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	10x

SSD
MZ7LN256HMJP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 470 samples	2x
ssd 512GBBench 73%, 4,609 samples	2x
SD8TB8U256G1001 256GBSandiskBench 73%, 4,613 samples	2x

RAM
16KTF1G64HZ-1G6P1 Ramaxel RMT3160MP68FAF1600 16GBMicronBench 45%, 2 samples	2x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	2x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16