Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221019
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 13 '23 at 19:50
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 71.7
1-Core 141
2-Core 283
88% 165 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 845
87% 701 Pts
64-Core 1,098
68% 1,098 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 134
Parallax 170
84% 136 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 120
Splatting 94.1
87% 108 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 85%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 1TB
858GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 262 174 108 99 96 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 70%
Amd-raid Array 3 479GB
445GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 280 176 108 97 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
47% Average
Read 384
Write 616
Mixed 466
SusWrite 175
93% 410 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 11.4
44% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 72.7
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 47.4
72% 130 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47%
Great: 110%
Amd-raid Array 2 239GB
223GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 276 181 111 99 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 261
Write 391
Mixed 269
SusWrite 175
62% 274 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 8.7
35% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 36.8
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 23.9
37% 65.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 35.2
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 44.5
SC Mixed 28.8
93% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 97.4
41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 102%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,885 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $774
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback