Monster ABRA A7 V12.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMonster ABRA A7 V12.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A7 V12.1
Memory17.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200512
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateMay 13 '23 at 13:00
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 224
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 528
56% 447 Pts
64-Core 558
34% 558 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 8535) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.56% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 5.5
4% 5.63 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 8
6% 7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.56%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$95
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 783 430 430 430 432 432 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,524
Write 1,616
Mixed 1,232
SusWrite 489
272% 1,215 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 66.1
217% 80.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,070
DQ Write 766
DQ Mixed 801
630% 879 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 199%
Great: 237%
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU-00B07 512GB
472GB free
Firmware: HXC7002Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1566 1460 1571 1548 1552 1580 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
300% Outstanding
Read 1,954
Write 1,558
Mixed 1,498
SusWrite 1,546
368% 1,639 MB/s
4K Read 62.3
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 80.6
270% 93.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,092
DQ Write 884
DQ Mixed 994
743% 990 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 300%
Great: 351%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 Samsung M471A2K43EB1-CWE 24GB
2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
47.8% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.8
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 12.3
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A7 V12.1 Builds (Compare 331 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A7 V12.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback