Red RHEL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRed RHEL  (all builds)
MotherboardRed RHEL-AV
Memory61.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '23 at 21:28
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon (Cascadelake)
CPU 0, 16 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 38
1-Core 89.9
2-Core 176
53% 101 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 696
62% 524 Pts
64-Core 1,299
80% 1,299 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 74%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 967GB
880GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 68 74 72 60 62 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Red Hat 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
MC Read 52.4
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 32.2
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 7.2
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 212
19% 212 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 158%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback