Asus TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 127%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics77.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '23 at 17:16
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900-$366
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 214
2-Core 424
128% 244 Pts
4-Core 856
8-Core 1666
150% 1,261 Pts
64-Core 2,880
178% 2,880 Pts
Poor: 96%
This bench: 127%
Great: 119%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Asus(1043 8854) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.3% Very good
Lighting 96.4
Reflection 128
Parallax 80.2
79% 101 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 91.2
Splatting 76.8
75% 94 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRS1000G 1TB
880GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,091
Write 4,920
Mixed 3,205
842% 3,739 MB/s
4K Read 72.8
4K Write 282
4K Mixed 114
405% 156 MB/s
DQ Read 2,058
DQ Write 1,726
DQ Mixed 2,052
1,493% 1,945 MB/s
Poor: 247% Great: 573%
WDS500G1X0E-00AFY0 500GB
458GB free
Firmware: 613200WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,168
Write 3,905
Mixed 2,920
747% 3,331 MB/s
4K Read 74.3
4K Write 308
4K Mixed 103
408% 162 MB/s
DQ Read 2548
DQ Write 2,140
DQ Mixed 2,177
1,676% 2,288 MB/s
Poor: 234% Great: 494%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JHE5600U4008JG 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
205% Outstanding
MC Read 89.3
MC Write 63.6
MC Mixed 72.2
214% 75 GB/s
SC Read 58.2
SC Write 72.7
SC Mixed 64.4
186% 65.1 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 156%
This bench: 205%
Great: 204%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 217%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 220%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $964
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback