Dell Precision T5600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision T5600
MotherboardDell Precision T5600  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190630
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '23 at 09:56
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 74.9
2-Core 146
58% 98.7 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 480
47% 383 Pts
64-Core 1,065
66% 1,065 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Gigabyte(1458 402E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.9% Average
Lighting 55
Reflection 56
Parallax 51.7
45% 54.2 fps
MRender 62
Gravity 49.8
Splatting 45.4
42% 52.4 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 435
Write 204
Mixed 176
59% 272 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 19.5
41% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 22.8
52% 108 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
910GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 135 138 136 136 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 122
Write 117
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 135
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung-00CE M393B1K70CH0-YH9 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.4
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T5600 Builds (Compare 900 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Dell Precision T5600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback