HP Pavilion Sleekbook 14 PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Sleekbook 14 PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18FA
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '23 at 17:15
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
42.6% Average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 59.9
2-Core 102
46% 75 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 143
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 18FA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.91% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 2.5
3% 3.17 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.91%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MZMPC032HBCD-000H1 32GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM12H1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 199
Write 77.7
Mixed 130
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 11.9
52% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 32.8
DQ Mixed 53
54% 91.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 44%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
695GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 86 88 71 90 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 108
Write 36.7
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 82.1
52% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.4
97% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH564128FH8NZQNSCG SH564128FJ8NWRNSQG 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
40.8% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 11.8
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Sleekbook 14 PC Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Sleekbook 14 PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback