Asus PRIME B350M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics88.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B350M-A  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '23 at 03:06
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 71.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 212
72% 131 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 632
62% 509 Pts
64-Core 811
50% 811 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Lighting 87.6
Reflection 133
Parallax 168
71% 130 fps
MRender 199
Gravity 90.2
Splatting 154
120% 148 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 257 252 228 256 257 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 490
Write 257
Mixed 287
SusWrite 251
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 34.2
125% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 191
160% 229 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 123%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
298GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 169 168 171 172 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 185
Mixed 84.1
SusWrite 170
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 102%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6B1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 30.7
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 34.7
SC Mixed 21.4
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B350M-A Builds (Compare 2,136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350M-A - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback