HP Laptop 15-dw1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15-dw1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 85F1
Memory7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '23 at 02:43
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 6405U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 76.1
1-Core 66.6
2-Core 110
53% 84.1 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 149
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 153
9% 153 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 85F1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
1.45% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 3.3
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.45%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CV8-8E128-HP 128GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V881
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 101 112 121 125 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 381
Write 119
Mixed 137
SusWrite 117
41% 189 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 18.1
70% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 126
102% 145 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.M4FF 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 11.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-dw1xxx Builds (Compare 1,303 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-dw1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback