Toshiba SATELLITE L50-A-161

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE L50-A-161  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel VG10F
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '23 at 17:55
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 169
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 396
42% 334 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M
Toshiba(1179 FA43) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
6.11% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 9.4
6% 7.57 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 8.4
Splatting 9.1
6% 7.4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.11%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9320423AS 320GB-$40
259GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0006HPM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 71 69 80 81 81 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 87.3
Write 88.4
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 76.1
55% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 Kingston 9905469-144.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
44% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13.7
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 13.4
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 44%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE L50-A-161 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L50-A-161

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback