Lenovo 5030CTO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 5030CTO  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '23 at 14:59
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31220-$305
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 68.8
2-Core 166
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 284
35% 266 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Asus(1043 83BE) 1GB
CLim: 910 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
8.86% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 10.6
8% 11.8 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 10.8
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.86%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY256HDHP-000H1 256GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 187 133 113 54 52 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59% Above average
Read 256
Write 234
Mixed 174
SusWrite 127
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 35.4
102% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 192
144% 192 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 59%
Great: 115%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
546GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 158 152 160 161 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 150
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 158
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
28% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 8.4
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 5030CTO Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 5030CTO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $555
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback