HP 280 Pro G6 Microtower PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics40.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemHP 280 Pro G6 Microtower PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8948
Memory5.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210807
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 09 '23 at 05:19
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500-$140
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 71
1-Core 128
2-Core 253
81% 151 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 759
72% 597 Pts
64-Core 820
51% 820 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 86BA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.9% Average
Lighting 53.2
Reflection 52.9
Parallax 46.9
43% 51 fps
MRender 41.2
Gravity 47.7
Splatting 43.6
36% 44.2 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 128GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s85
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,150
Write 541
Mixed 340
148% 677 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 6.6
78% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 61.9
92% 167 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 197%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
531GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 122 115 117 116 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 100
Write 133
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 115
67% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3200 Samsung M378A5244CB0-CWE 12GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.2% Average
MC Read 20
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 14.8
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 11
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 280 Pro G6 Microtower PC Builds (Compare 169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP 280 Pro G6 Microtower PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback