Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory16.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150410
Uptime12.1 Days
Run DateDec 05 '17 at 07:45
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 216
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 732
63% 538 Pts
64-Core 990
61% 990 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
PNY(196E 1033) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Lighting 43.3
Reflection 40.8
Parallax 54.8
35% 46.3 fps
MRender 55.5
Gravity 50.7
Splatting 38.2
38% 48.1 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 403
Mixed 327
92% 413 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 39
144% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 76.8
90% 155 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC4H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 171
Mixed 182
143% 190 MB/s
4K Read 0.98
4K Write 1.28
4K Mixed 0.37
105% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 111%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
128GB free
Firmware: CC26
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 103
Write 91.5
Mixed 115
78% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.28
71% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST2000DL 004 HD204UI 2TB
101GB free
Firmware: 1AQ1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 99.7
Write 122
Mixed 95.9
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2.45
4K Mixed 0.43
117% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 79%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
4.5TB free, PID 3322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 133
Write 112
Mixed 79.2
132% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 4.46
4K Mixed 0.59
174% 1.86 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAD 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.4% Good
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 23
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 16.2
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $357
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback