Lenovo 20JJS0HD00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20JJS0HD00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20JJS0HD00
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190418
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 08 '23 at 18:09
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 74.6
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 147
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 212
28% 212 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 5061) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1339
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.63% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 5.3
4% 4.17 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 5
Splatting 0.3
2% 3.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Thnsf5256gpuk TOSHIBA 256GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51055KLA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 227 235 245 264 253 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 498
Write 311
Mixed 243
SusWrite 236
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 25.6
90% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 443
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 279
226% 324 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATS1G64HZ-2G3A1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.9% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 8.1
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20JJS0HD00 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20JJS0HD00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback