Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4030Y 38 User benchmarks, average bench 44% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Memory 36.6 1-Core 42.1 2-Core 75 30% 51.2 Pts	4-Core 106 8-Core 47.3 12% 76.9 Pts	64-Core 47.8 3% 47.8 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4200 (Mobile 0.85 GHz) 3,426 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 0604) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	1.2% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 2.3 1% 1.5 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 1 Splatting 1.8 2% 1.83 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.2% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 SATA M.2 128GB 1,324 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: X231312 SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 190 178 189 187 187 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Read 382 Write 291 Mixed 177 SusWrite 194 58% 261 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 20.7 4K Mixed 12.9 50% 16.1 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 105 92% 138 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 2x2GB 9,651 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 8.1 21% 7.33 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 4.6 12% 4.17 GB/s	Latency 219 18% 219 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-4030YIntelBench 44%, 38 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4200 (Mobile 0.85 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 3,426 samples	1x

SSD
X110 SATA M.2 128GBSanDiskBench 72%, 1,324 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBSamsungBench 46%, 9,651 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16